iron_and_silver: (julian loves you)
Mysterious F ([personal profile] iron_and_silver) wrote2003-03-17 10:33 am

haha

my my fellow anti war people!! buy this!!

http://tshirtgiant.site.yahoo.net/cts1010.html

and man..the onion wrote this the day bush came into office..it was funny then.

http://www.theonion.com/onion3701/bush_nightmare.html

man. it irks me. this is totally why i didnt want bush in office..everything i feared with that man..has come true.
(deleted comment)

Re:

[identity profile] crainedaddy.livejournal.com 2003-03-17 07:22 pm (UTC)(link)
and that's really not something I can disagree with.

unfortunately, in the real world you've got to break some eggs to make an omelette and in this case, although it's sad, the eggs that are going to be broken to depose a violent dictator are iraqi.

if he cares about the people like he claims to, he will leave and no one will be harmed.

again, I have no doubt that war is sinister and evil and unfortunate. it's just my belief that sometimes justice has to be cruel to be effective.

(deleted comment)

Re:

[identity profile] crainedaddy.livejournal.com 2003-03-17 08:05 pm (UTC)(link)
how about using chemical agents against the Kurds in the 90s?

is that not evidence?
(deleted comment)

[identity profile] crainedaddy.livejournal.com 2003-03-17 08:15 pm (UTC)(link)
non-compliance with weapons inspectors, a greatly less than truthful declaration of weapons and cat and mouse games with the UN for 12 long years ought to be evidence enough for ANY reasonable person.

[identity profile] crainedaddy.livejournal.com 2003-03-17 08:17 pm (UTC)(link)
anyways, i'm going to bed...

you know your shit, though, and the back and forth was fun and thought provoking, sir.
(deleted comment)

last thing...i swear to god i'm really really leaving....haha

[identity profile] crainedaddy.livejournal.com 2003-03-17 08:23 pm (UTC)(link)
How do you publicly destroy missiles you've claimed to not have then?

[identity profile] crainedaddy.livejournal.com 2003-03-17 08:11 pm (UTC)(link)
And the reason it's not about South Korea right now is because we're just at the beginning of their time-line of opposition and they've got a lot of slack in the line they can run out until they've been as unerringly against freedom as Saddam has been for the last 12 years.

But if it does come time to deal with them, they wouldn't be able to fight back any better than Iraq would with the US and the UK breathing down their necks so denoting our choice to 'pick on' Iraq as any sort of cowardice by our nation is specious reasoning and nothing more.
(deleted comment)

Re:

[identity profile] crainedaddy.livejournal.com 2003-03-17 08:19 pm (UTC)(link)
the point is: we've give Saddam chance after chance and we're just now getting into it with S. Korea.

And they might have nukes, but as far as getting to the point where they'd be able to use them, that's another story.